Jump to content

Talk:United States House of Representatives

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleUnited States House of Representatives is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 5, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
December 22, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 1, 2005, and April 1, 2006.
Current status: Former featured article

Updates required

[edit]

House numbers need to be updated to Republican:217, Democratic:212, Vacant:6. I've tried, but couldn't do it. GoodDay (talk) 22:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: The current tally is set correctly, per House member data. Accoroding to the official House casualty list, Mike Gallagher is set to resign only on April 26th. JohnNatalis (talk) 23:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Greg Lopez was sworn in on the 8th. I can try to make as many updates as I can, but the diagrams are a little beyond my skillset. Especially the one with the caucus breakdown. Rexodus (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I'll update the diagrams and other tallies accordingly. JohnNatalis (talk) 13:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, could you please update to GOP 221, Dems, 213, with 1 vacancy and 218 majority?
Two new members were sworn in after election day, please see party breakdown site. I would make the edits but its a protected page and I am a new member. Thx! Hanada12 (talk) 20:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colors for american arch diagrams

[edit]

Hi, I'm maintaining the ParliamentDiagram tool which makes the apportionment diagrams you see in the article's infobox.

We have a specific page for making US diagrams with hardcoded colors and parties.

However, that page seems to be out of date with current practices on two main points :

- The ordering of Independent and Vacant seats. The order we use is Dem-Rep-Ind-Vac, but the current diagram puts the vacant seats in the middle, which represents the majorities more accurately. What order would you see as canonical ? And since the dems seat at the right of the speaker, wouldn't it make more sense to place them at the right of the diagram instead of the left ?

- The colors. We use #6b6b6b with no border for the vacant seats, when the current diagram uses pure-white with a .91 pure-black stroke around it. Our republicans are #ff0000 whereas yours are #e81b23, our dems are #0000ff whereas yours are #3333ff. And there are no independents in the current diagram, but we mark them as #c9c9c9. What colors would you see as canonical

Answers in issue #151 are more likely to be seen ! And this also concerns the Senate and any state legislature, so if there are places where contributors to US parliament pages hang out, feel free to notify them ! Gouvernathor (talk) 11:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LaMonica McIver

[edit]

LaMonica McIver becomes a congresswoman. The Democrats’ seats jump from 211 to 212. There are now 3 vacancies. 2603:7080:8600:26C1:7D51:D4AF:4362:8FD7 (talk) 21:55, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is WA not listed under the two-round election?

[edit]

WA uses the same system as Louisiana, which is listed. 2601:602:8880:4F70:A9C1:1293:904:7D78 (talk) 20:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent updates needed

[edit]

We need to update the structure to 218 majority again. Republicans have 221, Democrats 213, and one vacancy per the official House of Representatives party breakdown list. I can't edit yet since I'm a new member - I just made an account because I noticed this glaring mistake and I think it's important to update this page now that everyone's eyes are on the house. Hanada12 (talk) 17:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]