User talk:Rooster613

tzadikt

see http://www.chabad.org/library/archive/LibraryArchive2.asp?AID=7880 by the section that starts with "our Sages have remarked that the righteous are" (use 'find' under 'edit' on the toolbar)

I will also try to look up more detailes sources later.--Eliezer 12:44, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Proposed Judaism template

Hi Rooster613, please see and provide your input on the talk page of the proposed Template:Judaism. Thank you. IZAK 07:36, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sephirah (Kabbalah)

Hi Rooster: Looking at the Sephirah (Kabbalah) article, the following articles are waiting to be written:

Binah ("Understanding"; בינה)
Chesed ("Mercy"; חסד)
Gevurah ("Severity"; גבורה)
Tiphereth ("Glory"; תיפארת)
Netzach ("Victory"; נצח)
Yesod ("Foundation"; יסוד)
Malkhut ("Kingdom"; מלכות)

These have brief articles, but could use improvement:

Keter ("Crown"; כתר)
Chochmah ("Wisdom"; חכמה)
Hod ("Majesty"; הוד)
Da'at ("Knowledge"; דעת)

Best wishes, IZAK 10:00, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond the Ashes

i just wanted to tell you i read your book, very intresting i must say Nafi 05:07, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tzadik

Please see what I wrote in Tzadik, and if I only wrote from a chabad viewpoint please add in other viewpoints (like Breslov) as well. Thanks. --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 14:54, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also please comment on the talk page of chabad regarding what I wrote there: I have created a new article that deals with the concept of a Tzadik, and merged the contents of the "Relationship between God, the Rebbe and his followers" section into it. Therefore if there is consensus I will be removing the section from here and replace it with a link to Tzadik. --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 16:00, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I recently read your book Beyond the Ashes as part of my research. I enjoyed it immensely, well-written and highly informative. Daykart 23:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but be please aware that I have long since left the Renewalniks (in the mid-80s when they ceased to be anything resembling Orthodox, IMHO.) I stand by the book, but I was in B'nai Or, NOT "Jewish Renewal" as it exists today. However, I am not a revisionist, so what I wrote back then, I wrote. You might also be interested in my third book, Jewish Tales of Reincarnation, published by Jason aronson, Inc. in 2000. This is my re-telling of the types of stories I briefly refed in the Ashes books (yes, there is a sequel). Rooster613 16:49, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Rooster613[reply]

Plagues of Egypt

Hi Yonasan: Could you review the Plagues of Egypt article and perhaps imrove upon it? Wishing you and yours a Chag Kasher VeSameach. Thanks. IZAK 08:58, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of British Jews and Jewish Year Book

Please see the dialogue I am having with Grace Note re use of the Jewish Year Book as a valid source. I am sure that when you voted for the current policy on the List of British Jews, you intended to ensure that it was a list of people who were undoubtedly Jewish. Did you want to give carte blanche for quibbles that would allow the deletion of perfectly valid entries? Please read the talk page. Elkie Brooks was a good example, where the evidence adduced would convince any reasonable person that she is Jewish (and indeed Jayjg was convinced) but she was still deleted. (I have since found a quotation from the Jewish Chronicle and restored her.)

The persistent querying of the Jewish Year Book is another example. I don't know if you would support the deletion of the whole list, but whatever your view, given that the list exists it cannot make sense to delete several eminent undoubted Jews on dubious grounds. Please make your views known. - Newport 10:34, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rebbe Nachman of Breslov

Hi again. I have decided to submit this article to peer review in order to qualify for Featured Article status. Would you kindly click on the above link and add your comments or suggestions? Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rooster, thanks for getting involved on the talk page. I traced this new editor to his website, and found this unsavory post and comment. Hopefully this edit war won't last long. Kol tuv, Yoninah (talk) 20:30, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HMMMM.... I went there and read it, Yoninah, and must say that his goal to "capture" Wikipedia for his own website is not NPOV at all, if anything, he is blatantly self-promoting himself here. Of course he can post whatever he wants on his own site but it certainly gives us a heads-up about this guy. Rooster613 (talk) 07:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rooster613, first of all the "capture" wasn't on the actual post, maybe you saw it in someone's comments. Second of all, the Truth will capture the world, falsehood doesn't last, the Truth stands forever. One should not be threatened by being captured by the truth!

Na Nach, what is meant by "capture" here was an attempt to use Wikipedia to promote yourself or your own organization over and above other POVs. Please read the section on conflict of interest issues. There are times when your edits are not NPOV and come across as self-promoting of your own websites and org. Thi has nothing to do with TRUTH, it has to do with POLICY.

Please explain to me what exactly you mean by having the "heads-up" on this guy?!  The truth is that you are pretty much NPOV and maybe even pro Nanach, we have had our differences but they were in context. Editing and conduct of Yonina, however, is completely POV. Take a look e.g. at how he starts explaining the history of Nanach:

Although Na Nach Nachma is based on the name of Rebbe Nachman, he himself did not use it, and it was unknown in his day. However, he did say that repeating one word over and over was an effective form of meditation (Likutei Moharan Tinyana #96). His own personal mantra was Ribono shel Olam (Master of the Universe) which he pronounced with the Yiddish intonation as: Ree-BOY-noy shell OY-lahm. Many Breslover Hasidim today still prefer this mantra.

Huh? This section was not writen by Yoninah. This was originally written by me, rooster613, whom you just said was reasonably NPOV. Or maybe you do not think I'm NPOV after all? Rooster613 (talk) 09:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC) 08:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aside for the fact that he gives no references to this idiocy, and aside for the fact that it's wrong (Rabbi Nachman did tell people to say Ribono Shel Olam, and if they couldn't come up with other words they should repeat it, but I don't know off-hand of any place that says that he did this, and obviously this is not a mantra if one is supposed to be saying other things), please explain to me why it's relevent at all to know the Yiddish intonation: Ree-BOY-noy shell OY-lahm!?!? But I do grant him that this, every time I see this, it gives me joy, sheer madness. It would be one thing if he just put it up once, maybe he copied it from somewhere, but do you know how many times he reverted serious work to this idiocy?!?!

Does this make sense to you? Na Nach Nachmu Nachmun (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Na nach, it is relevant to know the Yiddish pronunciation because that is how Rebbe Nachman said it, he spoke Yiddish, not Israeli Hebrew, and the non-Na-Nacher Breslovers I know who use it (yes, there are such!) often draw out the OY part as a sigh -- again in Yiddish idiom. The Israeli pronunciation has no such play on words and it puts the accent on different syllables, which changes the rhythm. And it is not any more "idiocy" to include this than your insistence that everyone should be shouting Na Nach Nachma which appears NOWHERE in the writings of Rebbe Nachman and is a 20th-century phenomenon. There are different traditions within Breslov, there is no one single leader even though you keep insisting that there is. Rooster613 (talk) 08:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Peace Fellowship

Hello. I noticed you had expressed an interest in adding a Jewish Peace Fellowship article at one point, so wanted to give you a heads up that I've created a stub for the organization. Anything you can contribute would be helpful. Thanks. Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 23:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rooster613! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Lionel Friedberg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is now refed. There was a list of source websites on the discussion page which somebody has used to create footnotes on the main page. Hopefully this is enough to keep the page? Rooster613 (talk) 23:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

Hello, two new articles on the teachings of Rabbi Yisroel Ber Odesser have been nominated for deletion. If you would like to comment, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Song and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Petek. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Breslov dynasty vs group

Hi Rooster613: Your expert input would be welcome at this new discussion at: Talk:Breslov (Hasidic dynasty)#Dynasty vs "group". Thank you, IZAK (talk) 10:02, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited A Sacred Duty (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Reconstructionist and David Rosen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bird-head Haggadah.jpg

The file File:Bird-head Haggadah.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The image is inverted and cut badly.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard H. Schwartz

In 2011, I snapped a number of photos of Dr. Richard Schwartz, which you could add to the Richard H. Schwartz article, if you wish. MaynardClark (talk) 20:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]