Talk:Ludibrium

Notes

Why would someone quietly suppress the links at this entry to internet troll and hacker? Not a question of doubtful relevance, surely. Wetman 22:23, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hahah. The langauge in this article is at times amazingly impenetrable. I love it. Turly-burly 06:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ludibrium Party Quest

If a players wishes to enter, they need a party of six people levels 35 to 50. To pass the challenges of the party quest, a party must include: a thief with dark sight, a cleric or wizard with level 1 teleport, and a bowman or assassin with maxed range. Players pass through a series of challenges to proceed to the bonus stage, where they break boxes to earn hidden surprises including items and mesos.

The above was tacked onto the article. Can it be edited to shed light on ludibrium, the subject of this article? --Wetman 01:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tacking a ‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]} into an article takes less than a moment and requires only a passing whim. It's easy to read it as an act of laziness, even when not intentionally disruptive. I googled "Robert Anton Smith" and "Priory of Sion" and got two supportive quotes in a few minutes. The abuse of {{Fact}} templates by editors who just don't like some text makes more fastidious editors loathe to use them, even on legitimate occasions. The better sort are very sparing of ‹The template Talkfact is being considered for merging.› ^{[citation needed]}.--Wetman (talk) 14:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bohumil Hrabal uses "ludibrionism" in interviews; not exactly sure why. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.196.60.42 (talk) 02:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article lacks inline citations and contains opinions and other elements of personal essay and original research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.197.84 (talk) 00:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Definition?

Does "ludibrium" only refer to the conspiracy theories/hoaxes mentioned? Or is there a more general use for the term? It seems like an awfully narrow usage. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 23:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ludibrium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]